Have the 'adults' finished discussing 'philosophy'?
Don't want to disturb the 'mature folk' from their world altering thoughts.
Saully is a hyena, Satyr a gecko, phoneutria a pitbull, and I'm a komodo dragon.
Being a nothing, and a nobody, I can be anything and everything...for anyone.
Try a frog....KEK.
Little boxes for little minds, who cannot think without a reference manual, a self-help text....an aphoristic Nietzsche, for circumcised morons, on sale for $9.99.
If only the dead could speak...or dance.
Art requires generosity, and risk. Once externalized it no longer belongs to the artist; once he's shared it he can't take it back
Every douche-bag, needy, man-child, charlatan, can take the intent, reinterpret it, and use it for his own - reinterpreting it to fit into his own tiny boxes.
My method places the standard outside all minds.
I am as accountable, to it, as you,
Zooty, big 'monster'.
My words are not arbitrary, justified after-the-fact...or requiring esoteric connectivity. They refer to something all can perceive, and when I use them unconventionally, as with the term 'nihilism' I justify it pragmatically, without using mysticism, and idealism.
I erase all mysticism and idealism from language use....if, and when, possible. I try to reconnect all words back to their original references outside all minds...so that all can witness and appreciate and see.
All text can be validated....when it is about the world we all share.
If it's some private, fantasy, with a restricted reservation list, and strict membership codes to participate in thir 'meanings' - a self defined 'exclusive party' taking place in secret dark backroom dives....I really do not care to be included....unless it's for fun.
Like if there's a clown on the premises. I luc clowns..and whores...men-whores clowns are my favourite -
Keky...kinky.
Any philosophy that requires personal relationships, and private feelings, is not really philosophy.
World is indifferent, and harsh....pretty words and flattery, and hopeful backslapping is not philosophy.
Philosophy has to be applicable....explained in ways that a average mind can relate to, and not only some academic referencing his
edumucated nerd books-learning, nor some secret text referring to some secret alternate hidden world, circumventing the experienced world entirely.
Every philosophy worth something, can be explained using multiple different words - is not word-specific - because language is a tool for connecting to a shared reality.
A dog in French is not different from a dog in Italian...and if I could go back a hundred thousand years and the Neanderthals word for the canine of his period, will correspond to my version.
The phenomenon is shared, the words can differ.
"
A rose by any other name..."
For instance, I use 'pattern' to describe my metaphysics....but 'pattern' can be replaced by 'sequence'...and Flux, can be replaced by (inter)activity, and (inter)activity can be replaces by James'' 'affectance' or by attraction/repulsion...without losing its comprehensibility; without contradicting the application.
********
I've been kicked-out from many internet places, by pretentious cowards and hypocrites....so it's no big deal - like
ILP.
I'm surprised when I'm not.
I do not humour retards...and this makes be unlikable to 90% of the members on any given forum. Forums are run by minds interested in popularity...making money....whatever...so automatically this makes me a pariah.
Mass participation requires tolerance of idiocy and feebleness.
Lowest-common-denominator becomes the ideal all must abide by - '
no child left behind'.
This is more true when the 'ideas' depend on mass participation, on quantities, to remain viable...because they have no external reference. Without popularity they are valueless.
They have to be believed, or they disappear.
Some declare, assert, their private reality, which they've probably adopted from another....and some, like the
cAnus think the reverse....words can erase, can prevent a reality from coming to be.
Create reality using language, or destroy it, again using language, or denying language.
I've categorized these two nihilistic psychologies, as '
positive nihilism' and '
pure nihilism'.
One thinks words, symbols, asserted with passion, can create world.....the other, the more feminine, thinks that by refusing words, denying them, they can erase world, or parts of it.
In both cases
semiotics are the alpha/omega.
First came the word.....it is central to Abrahamism. The magical power of symbols/words.
Language made mystical, divine, by detaching it from the 'dirty', 'cruel', mundane world.
Subjectivity over objectivity.
When language is released from reality, it feels invigorating, liberating...like a god creator of noetic worlds.
Pretty words, placed in creative succession, pretending to be saying something deep and empowering, when they are circling and tying the mind in abstract knots, supported by emotions, sensations, dreams, hopes...ambitions rooted in coveting, in sexual frustration, in anxiety...in overcompensating insecurity.
Humouring, I can no longer perform, for any length of time.
Then again, realism quickly leads to agreement, among the honest and those with integrity - then what?
Agreement is a dead end, if there's nothing more....nowhere to go with it.
Where does one go from there?
Deeper insights result in revelations that eventually dry up, and integrity prevents one from the temptation of inventing insights by rearranging words.
If there's no shared passion to direct, no shared goal to unite, there's nowhere to go.
Bringing us full circle back to your cynicism.
It gives you resistance to charlatans, but lacking a focus for your energies, missing investment, you use it to run away; constant unravelling.